Posted by Sarah Tavel, Adventurista: http://www.adventurista.com/2010/02/why-arent-there-more-women-in-startups.html
Sunday, February 21, 2010
It’s become a common question: Why aren’t there more
women in venture funded startups? I speak to venture backed startups all the time. Unfortunately, more often than not, I don’t see a single female on the executive team roster. Over time, I’ve developed a hypothesis. For some reason, in the rare occurrence when I speak to a female CEO, it’s felt to me that I’m much more likely to find another female face on the company roster. It got me curious: Is this true? Are there actually more female executives in female-CEO led companies than male-led companies? If so, there are a number of implications.
To answer this question, Christine and I have done some good ole fashioned data collecting. Unfortunately, this has been a much more time consuming task than we had expected, so we’ve only gone through the US portfolio of three VCs: Accel, my firm Bessemer, and Sequoia (210 companies in total).
Given the small sample size, and the hot-button nature of the subject, let me first disclose what this data set is *not*:
- It is *not* statistically significant. There were only eight female CEOs in the sample set.
- It is *not* a complete data set. 210 companies out of several thousand.
- Christine and I originally pulled this data Sept-Oct 09, so some of it may already be out of date.
- Also note: I only counted VP and higher level executives and I excluded companies that didn’t list their executives
teamon their website *and* didn’t have a LinkedIn profile for the company (i.e. I couldn’t get accurate data). I also excluded companies that only had one executive (the CEO) for the obvious reason they haven’t hired any executives.
Given all those caveats, why publish the data? I can’t help but think this is an interesting dataset to understand, and the initial results are intriguing enough that I think it is worth trying to get more data. That said, Christine and I just can’t do it ourselves. So this blog post is actually a plea for help: I’m posting the data set in
Google Docs here. It’s read-only for everyone, but if you’re interested in contributing to the document, please email me and I’ll invite you.
Okay, okay. It’s not complete. You get it. So what did I find in the intial sample?
- There were 1219 male executives (90% of sample) vs. 134 female executives (10% of sample).
- 3.8% of the CEOs were
women(8 out of 210). (Which coincidentally, is around the percentage of womenwho are CEO of a Fortune 500 company – 3%.)
- 125 of the 210 companies (60%) did not have a single female on the executive
For the 134 female executives, the breakdown of the executive roles held by those
women is (I thought this was interesting and not what I expected):
Now the money question: In male-led vs. female-led companies, if we exclude the CEOs in both cases, what percentage of the executive